What have States Done to Ensure Insurance Parity?

printer friendly version (51K pdf)

Best Parity Laws
Parity applies to all mental health and substance abuse disorders under private insurance plans. No exemptions.

  • Connecticut 1999
  • Maryland 1994
  • Minnesota 1995
  • Vermont 1997
  • Oregon 2005

Good Parity Laws
Not quite comprehensive parity due to certain exemptions and/or limitations.

  • Indiana 1999/2001/2003
    Includes substance abuse; 50 employees exemption; 4% cost increase cap
  • Kentucky 2000
    50 employees exemption; includes substance abuse
  • Maine 1995/ 2003
    20 employees exemption; includes substance abuse; excludes diagnoses that are designated as “V” codes.
  • New Mexico 2000
    No substance abuse; 1.5% cost increase cap for less than 50 employees & 2.5% for 50 or more employees
  • North Carolina 1991/1997/2007
    Full parity for SMI; Financial parity for all other conditions; no substance abuse.
  • Rhode Island 1994/2001
    Some limitations on outpatient visits; includes substance abuse
  • Washington 2005/2007
    No substance abuse

Limited Parity Laws
Parity applies only to select groups such as those with severe mental illness (SMI) or state & local employees, or only protects against certain types of discrimination.

  • Arizona 1997/2001
    Mirrors federal law; 50 employees exemption; 1% cost increase cap; parity for state employees
  • Arkansas 1997/2001
    50 employees exemption; 1.5% cost increase cap; excludes state employees; full parity in SCHIP
  • California 1999 (SMI)
    Includes children
  • Colorado 1997/2007
    Includes substance abuse
  • Delaware 1998/2001 (SMI)
    Includes substance abuse
  • Hawaii 1999/2004 (SMI)
    25 employee exemption
  • Illinois 2001 (SMI)
    50 employee exemption
  • Iowa 2005 (SMI)
    50 employee exemption
  • Louisiana 1999 (SMI)
    Includes children; 50 employee exemption; 1% cost increase cap
  • Massachusetts 2000 (SMI)
    50 employees exemption; includes children & co-occurring disorders
  • Missouri 2004
    Limits out-of-pocket expenses; limited substance abuse treatment
  • Montana 1999 (SMI)
  • Nebraska 1999 (SMI)
    15 employee exemption
  • Nevada 1999 (SMI)
    Limits out-of-pocket expenses; 25 employees exemption
  • New Hampshire 1994/2002 (SMI)
  • New Jersey 1999/2002 (SMI)
  • New York 2006 (SMI)
    Includes children; 50 employee exemption
  • Ohio 2006 (SMI)
    1% cost increase cap
  • Oklahoma 1999 (SMI)
    50 employee exemption; 2% cost increase cap
  • South Carolina 2000/2005 (SMI)
    50 employees exemption
  • South Dakota 1998 (SMI)
  • Tennessee 1998
    25 employees exemption; 1% cost increase cap; excludes copayments, coinsurance and deductibles
  • Texas 1991/1997 (SMI)
    1991: Limited parity for state & local government employees 1997: parity expanded to rest of state; 50 employees exemption
  • Utah 2000
    Limits out-of-pocket expenses; 50 employees exemption
  • Virginia 2004 (SMI)
    Includes substance abuse; 25 employees exemption
  • West Virginia 2004 (SMI)
    2004 repealed alcohol coverage; 1 or 2% cost-increase cap

Mental Health Mandates, Not Parity

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • D.C.
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Kansas
  • Michigan
  • Mississippi
  • North Dakota
  • Pennsylvania
  • Wisconsin

No Parity or Mandate Laws

  • Wyoming
  • Idaho




© 2012 Mental Health America | formerly known as the National Mental Health Association